


You get your blood test results back. Everything’s “normal.” But what does that actually mean, and is normal the same as good?
Standard reference ranges tell you whether your levels fall within the range seen in 95% of the general population.
While it can help you spot clear abnormalities, it doesn’t tell you much about where your levels sit in relation to long-term health and longevity. That’s where optimal ranges come in.
In this article, we explain what optimal ranges are and how we use them at Thriva.
Normal reference ranges are the values used to interpret your blood test results. They’re how your GP decides whether something is “normal” or “abnormal.” These ranges are typically based on where 95% of a sample population falls.

Some ranges are set based on evidence linking specific levels to disease risk. Cholesterol reference ranges, for example, are influenced by their association with heart disease.
There are several limitations to normal reference ranges:
Optimal reference ranges can help us overcome some of these limitations.
At Thriva, we use a refined approach to establish optimal reference ranges. Our clinical team systematically reviews the latest scientific literature and clinical guidelines to identify ranges that are associated with improved health outcomes and longevity. This approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of your health beyond traditional reference ranges.
Optimal ranges are based on evidence linking specific levels of an analyte (a substance measured in a blood test) with a reduced risk of disease or enhanced life expectancy.
Take vitamin D as an example. Traditional vitamin D guidelines suggest that:
This range is only based on the relationship between vitamin D, your bone health, and your risk of osteoporosis.
However, vitamin D is important for many other things, like your muscle and immune health. So the evidence suggests that the optimal range for vitamin D is actually between 75 nmol/L and 100 nmol/L — this is associated with the lowest risk of death (from all causes).

It’s important to understand that optimal ranges are not always straightforward, and interpreting them requires a nuanced approach. While they are associated with better health outcomes, correlation does not always imply causation. Adjusting biomarkers to fit within these ranges does not automatically guarantee improved health, as the evidence can be complex and direct cause-and-effect relationships are not always clear. At Thriva, we base our recommendations on the most reliable evidence available.
Given these complexities, we don't suggest that targeting optimal levels for every biomarker is the only way to achieve better health and wellbeing. Instead, we encourage you to use optimal ranges as helpful guides to identify areas for improvement, while considering your overall health, lifestyle, and any existing medical conditions. Our doctors are here to provide personalised advice, tailored to your unique health needs and goals.
Normal reference ranges are useful for spotting clear abnormalities, but they don’t always give you the full picture.
Optimal ranges offer a more refined view, showing you where your results sit in relation to the latest evidence on disease risk and longevity. Think of them as a more ambitious benchmark, not a rigid target.
A “normal” result means your levels fall within the reference range used by the lab, which is typically the range where 95% of the general population sits. It rules out obvious abnormalities but doesn’t necessarily mean your levels are ideal for long-term health.
Not always. While optimal ranges are based on population-level evidence, what’s optimal for you can depend on your age, sex, health history, and lifestyle. They’re a useful starting point, but interpreting them in context is important.
Not necessarily. Optimal ranges highlight areas where there may be room for improvement, but a result in the normal range isn’t cause for concern on its own. If something is consistently at the edge of a range or you have symptoms, it’s worth discussing with a doctor.
Our clinical team reviews the latest scientific literature and clinical guidelines to identify ranges associated with the lowest risk of disease and improved life expectancy. These ranges are continually updated as new evidence becomes available.